Roku 2, unfortunately, is not DLNA certified also. Many devices with restrictive file format / codec compatibility make up for their shortcomings by advertising DLNA certifications. Unfortunately, my opinion is that it is often better in terms of time and money to just invest in a different player that doesn't force you to re-encode your existing content. The first one is to try to re-encode the content to fit in with the players' restrictions. I believe that the SoC supports only upto 1080p30 video, and Roku must be appreciated for trying to decode the video at that frame rate.Ĭonsidering the above test results, I can only say that the Roku 2 XS is almost useless for local media playback. I have seen people solve these type of media compatibility issues in two ways. The clip played back without any artifacting, but it seemed to drop every alternate frame, and the panning appeared very staggered. The third file to be recognized was a 1080p60 MP4 file from a Sanyo camcorder. The second one was actually a 240p M4V extension file, and it played back without any issues. The SoC just couldn't support the 9 reference frame L 5.0 H.264 clip. Selecting the video resulted in a blank screen. The first one was an MP4 file with H.264 video and AAC audio. Out of our 57 test streams, only 3 streams were recognized. As of firmware version 4.1 build 1275, the supported file types dialog box only listed the following: Out of curiousity, I went to the Help section. The Roku USB Media Player channel was installed and the USB drive was promptly recognized. Given the above list, I loaded up our latest test suite on an NTFS formatted USB3 SSD, expecting to spend some time evaluating the local media playback capabilities. The Roku 2 box is very clear on what it supports:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |